His Centre

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
823399298
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Bulverde, TX, USA
Phone
8302284504
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,168,849
Expenses
$2,040,714
Assets
$5,397,811
Liabilities
$2,344,208

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MECHELLE SALMON (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MECHELLE SALMON (CEO): $87,074 total reported compensation
  • ALISON MCCULLY (CFO): $81,869 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

H.i.s. Centre, a Texas nonprofit corporation ("h.i.s.") is located in spring branch, comal county, Texas. The purposes of h.i.s. Generally are to operate exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986 as amended form time to time or corresponding provisions of any subsequent federal tax law (the "code"), by engaging directly in support of such purposes or by making distributions to other organizations for use, by the distributees, in support of such purposes and to engage in any and all lawful activities incidental to the foregoing purposes. H.i.s.'s activities focus on two general areas: (i) administer and manage comprehensive educational programs and training sessions for emergency medical professionals in order to provide prehospital emergency medical care ("edu"), and (ii) provide a community health program ("chp") using mobile healthcare practitioners ("mhp').

What it reported doing in 2024

Established in 2010 under the direction of a medical director in order to create a comprehensive program to credential the clinical and operational abilities of emergency medical service ("ems") providers in providing prehospital emergency medical care. A quality assurance/quality improvement program was also developed and implemented to monitor compliance and to ensure the delivery of high quality, safe patient care by the organization and its providers that complete the edu programs and training sessions ("participating ems"). By participating, in the edus, the participating ems providers establish best practices and provide the highest quality care to the patients in their communities. Specifically, the goals of the edu are accomplished by undertaking the following activities:1. Clinical credentialing programs as set forth by a medical director(s) to all personnel providing care under the medical director(s) license, authority, and oversight.2. Annual paramedic 12 lead ekg course & test prep for critical thinking.3. Monthly morbidity and mortality reviews and ongoing performance improvement plans4. Quality assurance/quality improvement compliance programs related to personnel, equipment, supplies, and skills maintenance and competency.5. Emergency medical technician course for adults and high school students along with an anatomy practicum.6. Continuing education classes for medical healthcare professionals. These classes are offered to organizations such as fire departments, ems, and hospital systems.7. Higher education classes in anatomy, critical care skills and suturing for emergency medical professionals including, but not limited to, doctors, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, nurses and research student. Also offered directly to institutes of higher education.8. Military workshops for specialized medical training and critical care skills. These classes are attended by members of the us army, us air force, us navy, national guard, and other us governmental groups.9. Conferences for healthcare professionals. Conferences are offered to healthcare professionals, providers, and organizations all over the world.10. Medical workshops for healthcare professionals. These are offered to healthcare professionals, doctors' groups and emergency medical groups.11. Device development and validation for emergency medical services personnel and hospital-based professionals, hospital and prehospital organizations.12. Data analytics, where data is analyzed to determine that a system is making a difference in prehospital or hospital-based initiatives. Services offered to emergency medical services personnel, hospital-based professionals, hospitals, and prehospital organizations.13. E-lab live and video-based training programs to improve patient care skills, to emergency medical services personnel, hospital-based professionals. Hospital and prehospital organizations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.2%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 91.3%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $156.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.9%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.65; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.3%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 35% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.2% of revenue deployed · 91.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $87K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.