His Branches Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237060337
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Rochester, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5852359000
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,549,010
- Expenses
- $2,140,368
- Assets
- $1,440,977
- Liabilities
- $584,075
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Beth Larter (President)
- Mike Weston (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Ali Reeves (Chief Medical Officer): $133,373 total reported compensation
- Matthew Mack (Doctor): $125,581 total reported compensation
- Mike Weston (Executive Director): $108,154 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We exist to show God's love to the world to bring hope, healing, and restoration to our community through medical care and community development by providing quality care that addresses the physical, mental, emotional, practical, and spiritual needs of each patient.
What it reported doing in 2024
Medical Care - His Branches is a primary care medical facility that is uniquely neighborhood-centric, with two practice locations in the 19th Ward and Beechwood neighborhoods of Rochester, NY. In addition to primary care our services include: women's and prenatal care, integrated behavioral health care, on-site laboratory, telehealth, psychotherapy and case management. In our 2024/2025 fiscal year we served a panel of 3,645 patients, of all ages, through 8,884 patient visits. In identifying needs and creating strategies and solutions that provide care for the whole person, we address all aspects of well-being: body, mind, and spirit. (Continued on Schedule O)We specialize in meeting complex needs and removing barriers to good health, with specific training and care provided for the ethnically and economically underserved of Rochester. We offer group learning and wellness initiatives on a number of topics including: grief and trauma management, chronic conditions, and nutrition in order to facilitate the connection to much needed social support services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.4%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $61.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.2%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.4% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.