Himalayan Institute Humanitarian
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851537306
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Homesdale, PA, USA
- Phone
- 5702535551
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Relief
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $186,502
- Expenses
- $146,147
- Assets
- $121,508
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jeff Abella (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- Jeff Abella (PRESIDENT)
- Greg Capitolo (TREASURER)
- Alat Tigunait (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of HI Humanitarian is to engage in activities that include but not limited to: (a) Developing and supporting humanitarian efforts that promote literacy, equality, wellness, and poverty alleviation through community level projects globally. (b) Supporting public health, preventive health, and integrative wellness. (c) Providing vocational training, skills development, adult education, and micro-enterprise programs. (d) Providing women's empowerment and family enrichment programs. (e) Providing literacy and educational programs for children. (f) Assisting with environmental regeneration efforts; and (g) Making distributions for charitable purposes. distributions for charitable purposes.
What it reported doing in 2024
Hih primarily develops and supports humanitarian projects operated by the himalayan institute cameroon (hic). Hic has a fully active community center that is 20 years old. Hih performs fundraising activities in addition to program and project development collaboration with hic.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.7%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 99.2%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.6%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.7% of revenue deployed · 99.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $145K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.