Hilo Pony Baseball Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933398213
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Hilo, HI, USA
Phone
8083452092
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Reported finances

Revenue
$71,568
Expenses
$64,934
Assets
$12,615
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jared Cabatu (President)
  • Neil Azevedo (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Dayson Taniguchi (Director)
  • Rodney Namauu (Director)
  • Jared Cabatu (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hilo Pony Baseball, Inc is dedicated to fostering a love for the game while teaching essential life skills. Our mission is to inspire teamwork, develop character, and create lasting memories for players and families.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization provided youth with opportunities to develop their baseball skills while fostering teamwork, sportsmanship, and leadership. Pony Baseball had a pinto (8U) team compete in Rodeo, California for the World Series, and win the state championship during our tournament. Over 400 athletes benefit from the program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.1%; rating input score 64
  • Program expense ratio: 70.6%; rating input score 71

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.3%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 199.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 169.1% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 71.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.1% of revenue deployed · 70.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $46K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.