Hillsides
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 951644002
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Pasadena, CA, USA
- Phone
- 323-254-2274
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $51,634,378
- Expenses
- $47,451,854
- Assets
- $46,679,128
- Liabilities
- $15,684,491
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
41 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STACEY R ROTH (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- STACEY R ROTH (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $526,536 total reported compensation
- GINA PEREZ (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER &): $354,366 total reported compensation
- GREG SANTILLI (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $301,912 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are dedicated to healing children and young adults, strengthening families, and transforming communities through quality comprehensive services and advocacy.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community based and educational services: family resource centers - families struggling through crises or challenging situations know they can find experienced practitioners who are responsive, accessible, and compassionate. Hillsides offers numerous community-based programs and services through several hillsides family resource centers in los angeles county. These centers provide parenting classes, mental health support, psychological testing, psychiatric assessments and medication management, crisis intervention and additional crucial resources for children and families in need. (see shedule o for continuation)they also provide in-home individual and family therapy to families at risk who are unable to access the services in our resource centers. Hillsides' staff intervenes before children are removed from their homes in order to preserve families, help them begin to recover, and create secure, permanent living environments. In addition, the agency offers school-based mental health services in surrounding school districts because children's needs are often first detected in the school setting. Hillsides turns obstacles into opportunities to restore hope and honor the inherent integrity of each individual in every family.education support services (ess) - offers an alternative intervention for students struggling in school and other settings. A team of specialists work closely with students and their families to identify strengths and barriers and tailor treatment plan. The goal of ess is to help both the child and family build skills that allow students to be successful in the school, home, and community. 2,918 clients served; impacting 6,620 family members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 83% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.5%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 86.1%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $55.37 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.1%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.98; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 79.5% of revenue deployed · 86.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 31 of 31 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $40.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $527K · 41 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.3M reported
- Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.