Hillsdale College
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 381374230
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Hillsdale, MI, USA
- Phone
- (517) 437-7341
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Undergraduate College (4-year)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $423,688,130
- Expenses
- $292,735,155
- Assets
- $2,265,227,618
- Liabilities
- $316,126,664
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
48 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LARRY P ARNN (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- LARRY P ARNN (PRESIDENT): $1,325,414 total reported compensation
- JOHN CERVINI (EVP FOR INST. ADVANCEMENT): $617,108 total reported compensation
- ROBERT NORTON (VP & GENERAL COUNSEL): $454,620 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Hillsdale College seeks to provide an education that is both classical and liberal, rooted in the Western tradition and the principles of the American Founding, and to extend that teaching mission to the nation's leaders and citizens through its graduate schools and educational outreach programs.
What it reported doing in 2024
Student instruction hillsdale college maintains its defense of the classical liberal arts curriculum, convinced that it is the best preparation for meeting the challenges of modern life and that it offers to all people of all backgrounds not only an important body of knowledge, but also timeless truths about the human condition. The liberal arts are dedicated to stimulating students' intellectual curiosity, to encouraging the critical, well-disciplined mind, and to fostering personal growth through academic challenge. As such, the college maintains a rigorous core curriculum of 50 academic credits, including required courses in western and american history, the great books, the u.s. Constitution, logic and rhetoric, philosophy, theology, mathematics, the arts and sciences, and more. In addition to the core curriculum, students choose from 30 majors and seven interdisciplinary majors. Seven minors-only programs and nine pre-professional programs are also offered. The four-year undergraduate course of study culminates in a bachelor of arts or bachelor of science degree. Hillsdale college is consistently ranked high on lists of the best liberal arts colleges in the nation by such publications as u.s. News & world report, the princeton review, forbes, and kiplinger's personal finance. In addition to its undergraduate program of instruction, the college operates the van andel graduate school of statesmanship on campus, offering master's and doctoral degrees in politics; the steve & amy van andel graduate school of government in Washington, d.c., offering a master of arts degree in government; and the diana davis spencer graduate school of classical education offering a master of arts degree in classical education. The college is committed to the excellence of its students in both intellect and character. This commitment is reflected in the student honor code, which reads, "a hillsdale college student is honorable in conduct, honest in word and deed, dutiful in study and service, and respectful of the rights of others. Through education the student rises to self-government." hillsdale boasts a student-faculty ratio of 8 to 1. It has 170 full-time and 71 adjunct faculty, 91 percent of whom hold the highest degree in their disciplines.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 87
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 45.2%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 60%; rating input score 60
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.3%; rating input score 94; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 30.9%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.74; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 45.2% of revenue deployed · 60% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 33 of 35 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $175.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 48 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $77.4M reported
- Consistency: 44 of 44 current checks pass
- Schedules: 13 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 33 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 27 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 14/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.