Hillsboro Swim Team
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930936464
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Hillsboro, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5037806002
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Racquet Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $751,215
- Expenses
- $749,293
- Assets
- $254,865
- Liabilities
- $460
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Cullette Sommers (President)
- Brenda Montgomery (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Cullette Sommers (President)
- Brenda Montgomery (Vice President)
- Desi Kurtz (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Hillsboro Swim Team is a USA Swimming club that provides year-round, competitive swimming for the youth in the surrounding communities. The HEAT promotes long-term athlete development as well as the growth of character and sportsmanship. Swimmers are given opportunities to challenge themselves, strive for personal and team achievements, and build skills to last a lifetime. The HEAT is committed to providing a safe, healthy and positive environment for athletes and to following USA Swimming's Safe Sport Policies.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provide coaching and teaching swimming to children aged 5-25. The club swim team benefited on average 190 swimmers during 2024/25 swim season. Swimmers competed in various local and national competitive swim meets.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.9%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 84.1%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $26.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.9% of revenue deployed · 84.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $630K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.