Hillsboro Lighthouse Preservation Society Fund Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 844098018
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Pompano Beach, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9546957535
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,454
- Expenses
- $78
- Assets
- $122,290
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KENNETH HERMAN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KENNETH HERMAN (PRESIDENT)
- EDWARD DIETRICK (VICE-PRESIDE)
- BETSY SLAGLE (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation is incorporated for the specific charitable purpose of serving as a "support organization" to be supervised or controlled in connection with the board of directors of hillsboro ligthouse preservation society inc, a Florida corporation not-for-profit and tax exempt public charity (65-0803910). The corporation is to support, promote, sponsor and pursue educational, scientific, civic and charitable activities, which are central to the mission of hillsboro lighthouse preservation society, inc.
What it reported doing in 2024
The corporation is incorporated for the specific charitable purpose of serving as a "support organization" to be supervised or controlled in connection with the board of directors of hillsboro lighthouse preservation society inc, a Florida corporation not-for-profit and tax exempt public charity (65-0803910). The corporation is to support, promote, sponsor and pursue educational, scientific, civic and chartitable activities, which are central to the mission of hillsboro lighthouse preservation society inc.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 99.3%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1,567.82; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.