Hillsboro Classified United Local 4671 Aft Afl-cio
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521734984
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2009
- Location
- Hillsboro, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5036812111
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $317,071
- Expenses
- $280,121
- Assets
- $478,095
- Liabilities
- $40,210
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BETHANY SCHAFFNER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BETHANY SCHAFFNER (PRESIDENT): $36,841 total reported compensation
- KARLA BROKAW (TREASURER): $22,671 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
1. To provide an effective collective bargaining representative and to promote the general welfare of education employees. 2. To bring the local into relations of mutual assistance with the american federation of teachers, its state federation and locals. 3. To fight all forms of bias in education employment and education delivery due to race, creed, sex, age, sexual preference, social, political or economic status or national origin. 4. To organize all education workers in Oregon into one united organization for the benefit of the entire education community. 5. To work for passage and retention of just laws which will improve the climate for students and education employees. 6. To work for advancement of the public image, including passage and retention of appropriate laws, which will protect and promote the role of classified employees and education workers in the delivery of quality education.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided oversight to ensure compliance with current collective bargaining contracts that cover approximately 400 district employees. Negotiated the collective bargaining agreement covering classified employees, provided representation to members involved in grievances and other personnel actions, communicated with bargaining unit members regarding educational issues and the union's position on those
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.7%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.71; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.2%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $37K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.