Hilliard Food Pantry Plus

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237159829
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Hilliard, OH, USA
Phone
6143634159
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,067,371
Expenses
$770,150
Assets
$1,719,398
Liabilities
$4,085

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Erin West (Executive Director)
  • Sharon Grenier (President)
  • Randy Stern (Vice-President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Erin West (Executive Director): $80,148 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hilliard Food Pantry Plus mission is to improve the well-being of our community by providing food and support

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, Hilliard Food Pantry Plus served more than 17,000 individuals through programs designed not only to meet urgent needs, but also to help families build stronger and more stable futures. The organization distributed more than 800,000 pounds of nutritious food through pantry services and senior outreach while the Hilliard Rotary Teaching Garden provided fresh produce and hands-on education in gardening, nutrition, and healthy living. Hilliard Food Pantry Plus also provided $67,463 in utility assistance to 339 families facing financial hardship and assumed management of Feeding Hilliard Students, ensuring that more than 400 students received food every Friday to help carry them through the weekend. Through resource clinics, neighbors received individualized support navigating housing concerns, benefit applications, employment barriers, and access to community resources, resulting in 176 benefit applications facilitated during the year. Educational classes in cooking, gardening, budgeting, and financial literacy further equipped families with practical tools to strengthen household well-being and long-term stability. At the same time, Hilliard Food Pantry Plus continued to expand its Plus programs, creating spaces where generosity, encouragement, and community connection could thrive. The Share Closet, a free store open to everyone in the service area, provided clothing, household goods, books, and other essentials grounded in the belief that there is enough to go around. Seasonal initiatives such as the Holiday Shop and Back-to-School Giveaway helped families navigate financially stressful seasons with practical support and moments of joy, while resident services offered personalized guidance and meaningful connections to additional community resources. These efforts were powered by more than 1,500 volunteers who contributed 6,781 hours of service across all organizational programs

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.9%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 91.3%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $34.2 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27.8%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.23; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.4%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 26.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.9% of revenue deployed · 91.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $703K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $80K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.