Hill Country Transit District
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 752764631
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Belton, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2549333700
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Government and Public Administration
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,294,935
- Expenses
- $17,893,940
- Assets
- $16,183,980
- Liabilities
- $2,727,594
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DARRELL BURTNER (AGM PLANNING & REGIONAL DEV): $110,323 total reported compensation
- LUIS PINO (DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY): $103,689 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To build, refine, and operate a safe, dependable, and effective transportation network.
What it reported doing in 2025
Killeen Division - Provision of an urban Commuter Bus service, demand response service, and a microtransit service. For 2025, 27,101 Commuter Bus trips, 149,490 demand response trips, and 95,016 microtransit trips were provided.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 63% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.6%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 67.3%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.5%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.6% of revenue deployed · 67.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $12M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $110K · 13 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $848K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.