Highlands Latin School Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 921026877
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Winter Park, FL, USA
- Phone
- 4074420393
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Primary, Elementary Schools
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,307,021
- Expenses
- $1,091,692
- Assets
- $432,164
- Liabilities
- $24,430
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARIE DRURY (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARIE DRURY (PRESIDENT): $64,050 total reported compensation
- MARY ANN VERNACE (SECRETARY): $64,050 total reported compensation
- BART VERNACE (TREASURER): $15,800 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Hls orlando is a k-8 private, classical, christian school. Our goal is to provide our students with a classical education of the highest quality and to create a private school which is a model of excellence in both academics and christian character.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide a classical, christian and traditional education for approximately 130 students. In the traditional classroom, a knowledgeable, enthusiastic teacher carefully leads students into an understanding of each subject. Our goal is to provide our students with a classical education of the highest quality and to create a private school which is a model of excellence in both academics and christian character.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 76.6%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.5%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.2%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 42.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 48.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 76.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64% of revenue deployed · 76.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $836K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $64K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.