Highlands Football Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 992527292
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5053459616
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,424
- Expenses
- $8,334
- Assets
- $2,090
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANTHONY JARAMILLO (President)
- PAUL GRINDSTAFF (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- ANTHONY JARAMILLO (President)
- PAUL GRINDSTAFF (Vice President)
- ROMAN ROMERO (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Mission of the Highlands Football Association (HFA) is to carry out the values and traditions instilled in its members while in attendance at NMHU and uplift and enhance the experience within the current players in the football program. HFA strives through its efforts to support the football program at New Mexico Highlands University by helping to provide student-athletes the opportunity to achieve academic and athletic excellence. HFA is committed to engaging current players, alumni, and friends who embrace NMHU football and want to be part of the success of the football program and its student-athletes. Watching them compete in the sport they love, earn a degree from New Mexico Highlands University, transition into a career and be successful in their lifelong endeavors as outstanding NMHU graduates and global citizens.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Highlands Footbal Association riased a total of 11293.25 in the year 2024. A donation of 6,000.00 was made to the New Mexico Highlands University footbal program in the year 2024. We look forward to growing our membership and making more contributions to the football program. The football program needs our support.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 36
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.6%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.6% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.