Highland County Domestic Violence

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311178289
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Hillsboro, OH, USA
Phone
9373938118
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Family Violence Shelters

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$864,888
Expenses
$938,113
Assets
$214,263
Liabilities
$68,999

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAMELA LIMES (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DARA GULLETTE (DIRECTOR): $70,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Services to victims of crime

What it reported doing in 2024

Since 1981, the h/c domestic violence task force(alternatives to violence) provides counseling, supportive services and court advocacy services to victims of sexual, emotional, and physical abuse.specific services available are: a 24 hour crisis hotline, safe homes, supportive services, transporting clients to safe homes, support groups, individual counseling, providing knowldgeable information about court proceedings involving domestic violence, sexual assault or related cases and providing an advocate to accompany the victims to court. In addition, our staff responds to calls from local hospitals and law enforcement agencies whenever they request our help and assistance to domestic violence and sexual assault victims. The agency also offers rape exams, certified nurses training and nurse contractual services to help victims of abuse and rape. The agency also works with other agencies to provide information concerning available resources for child care, housing, employment, transportation, clothing and food. Currently the agency is providing domestic violence, anger management and parenting classes for offenders. Those offenders are referred to our agency by the courts, corrections departments, human services or children services and are required to complete the program in order to be in compliance with the requirements put forth by theses agencies. The services rendered by the task force are to victims of emotional, physical, or sexual abuse, whether it was past or present. The organization accomplishes this task through advocacy and court advocacy which are supportive services to the client which could include going to court and assisting the victim with their legal rights. In addition, supporting them if they choose not to utilize the court. 24 hour shelter is available through the agency with the use of a 24 hour crisis line and volunteers who might need to spend time with the client or transport them to a safe home. Support group, housing for the victims due to violence, child care, education, and awareness programs are also a major part of the organization. In the year, approximately 600 new clients were served by the highland county domestic violence task force for highland county and an estimated 400 new clients for clinton county. An additional 600 individuals for highland county and 600 individuals for clinton county will be served in municipal and county courts, through our 24-hour crisis line, and telephone inquiries regarding domestic violence, assistance, and referrals. Both offices will reach an estimated 20,000 people through community and school presentations, distribution of educational and informational materials, and awareness campaigns throughout the year. The ocjs baseline grant is for office and payroll expenses. The ocjs jag grant is allocated to clinton county youth services and victims of greenfield. The ocjs family violence grant is allocated to highland county youth services and victims of clinton county. All other funding is placed in the general fund for the purpose of paying all fees and expenses incurred by the agency. A few exceptions to this are: the voca fund, which is designated to pay 75% of the directors salary and four court/family advocates salaries. The title xx fund is designated for direct service hours.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 65% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.6%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 65.1%; rating input score 65
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.71 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.6% of revenue deployed · 65.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $610K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $70K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.