High Watch Recovery Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 060674970
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Kent, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8609273772
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $37,384,394
- Expenses
- $35,139,695
- Assets
- $79,283,760
- Liabilities
- $30,360,623
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREW ROBERTS (CEO / PRESIDENT)
- TAMI-JO STEVENSON (VICE PRESIDENT OF CLINICAL)
- JEROME W SCHWAB III (FORMER CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- GREGORY BORIS DO (SECRETARY/VP-MEDICAL): $577,837 total reported compensation
- JEROME W SCHWAB III (FORMER CEO): $571,403 total reported compensation
- DEREK TRANZILLO (CFO (THRU 12.31.24)): $488,046 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
High watch recovery center is dedicated to seeing the disease of addiction go into remission for each individual who passes through the door. We are committed to providing compassionate care as we integrate the latest breakthroughs in addiction medicine alongside the spiritual teachings of aa's 12 steps to give all patients the tools and foundation to live sober after leaving high watch.
What it reported doing in 2024
Rehabilitation of individuals with substance use disorder and co-occurring disorder. "wilson beds" program provides room, board, and treatment at high watch recovery center, free of charge for qualifying individuals the value of which is estimated at $748,007 for 2024. The center's policy is to always have 7 "extended guests" on campus who suffer from chronic recidivism. The extended guests are provided room, board, and treatment at high watch the value of which is estimated at $1,985,550 for 2024. Altogether, financial assistance and charity care to guests in 2024 totaled $2,733,557
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.7%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 76.5%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.93 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.26; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.4%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.7% of revenue deployed · 76.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $26.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $578K · 17 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5.2M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.