High Point Youth Ranch Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 871719117
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Kiefer, OK, USA
- Phone
- 9188071150
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Children's, Youth Services
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,471
- Expenses
- $9,810
- Assets
- $18,786
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Brandon Morrell (President)
- Douglas Howard (Vice-President)
People named in this filing
- Brandon Morrell (President)
- Douglas Howard (Vice-President)
- Sharolyn Wallace (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a safe, nurturing, and Christ-centered environment where youth can realize God's purpose for their lives and be empowered and equipped with the necessary skills and tools to overcome adversity and transform their lives emotionally, spiritually, physically, and mentally.
What it reported doing in 2022
Heart of David Leadership Program was a 10-week leadership development program that was held in 2021. Following that program, in 2022, we continued with Advanced Individual Training - a continuation of the program with monthly meetings. 13 young men, ages 14+ continued in the program. Emphasis was placed on physical, mental, spiritual & emotional development.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 24
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 13.8%; rating input score 14
- Program expense ratio: 40.1%; rating input score 40
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 65.5%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.91; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -21.6% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 99.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 197.3% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 13.8% of revenue deployed · 40.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.