High Point Village Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 611562223
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lubbock, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8066980015
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,595,920
- Expenses
- $1,680,773
- Assets
- $5,509,641
- Liabilities
- $44,254
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TREY DUNCAN (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT NATHAN BRYANT (EXECUTIVE DI): $91,057 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To create a village where individuals with intellectual disabilities can live, learn, work, worship, and achieve their full potential. Day programs are currently offered in preparation for a residential community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Additional programs include afternoon enrichment classes which are designed for individuals with intellectual disabilities ages 8 and above. There are spring and fall semesters, each meeting one hour for each of 13 weeks. Recreational classes stress teamwork while improving coordination and health. Academic enrichment is provided through reading, while classes such as independent living and cooking build essential life skills. Fine arts and craft classes are very popular and provide opportunities for creativity. The underlying purpose of this program is to provide a supportive peer group and fun after-school activities. A fairly new program is respite weekends. Small groups of individuals with intellectual disabilities spend a weekend with trained high point village staff in a local airbnb home with the overall purpose of providing 48 hours of respite to their daily caregivers. Meaningful activities for these weekends include dining out, movies, and other community activities as well as planned activities in the home.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.8%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 80.9%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.28; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.8% of revenue deployed · 80.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $91K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.