High Point Regional Association of Realtors Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 566063011
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- High Point, NC, USA
- Phone
- 3368898181
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $785,470
- Expenses
- $763,365
- Assets
- $1,407,191
- Liabilities
- $137,065
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LISIA AMBURN (CEO)
- RHONDA WILSON-HENRY (PRESIDENT)
- MARSHALL MORGAN (PRESIDENT EL)
People named in this filing
- MONICA UNDERWOOD (TREASURER)
- LISIA AMBURN (CEO)
- RHONDA WILSON-HENRY (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Formed for the purpose of uniting those engaged in the recognized branches of the real estate profession for the purpose of exerting a beneficial influence upon the profession and related interests, promoting and maintaining high standards of conduct in the real estate profession, whereby their interests may be safeguarded and advanced. The association advocates for the rights of private ownership and promotes a positive realtor image. It serves its members by providing education and training, creating awareness through communication, enforcing the code of ethics, and promoting private property rights. The association services a geographical area encompassing all of high point, nc and the surrounding areas. It had 565 active members as of december 31, 2024.
What it reported doing in 2025
Central carolina regional leadership academy (ccla)- to provide a platform for current and emerging realtors to gain real estate industry and regional knowledge that would prepare and equip them to fill volunteer leadership positions, thereby enhancing the realtor brand.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 53% for direct work, and 47% for affiliated organizations.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.2%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 81.5%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.8%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.84; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 44.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.2% of revenue deployed · 81.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $622K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.