High Point Convention & Visitors Bureau Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813989556
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- High Point, NC, USA
- Phone
- 3368845255
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,223
- Expenses
- $64,897
- Assets
- $444,313
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- DAVID NICOLETTA (Chairman)
- CHRIS AMOS (VICE CHAIR)
- LUCY ORTIZ (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
1. To enhance educational, artistic, scientific, and historical activities as it relates to tourism in high point, North Carolina, including but not limited to furniture, textiles and design.2. To explore growth opportunities in high point, North Carolina that will enhance the tourism climate of the region and state.3. To fund educational, artistic, scientific, and historical ventures that showcase high point, North Carolina as a premier destination to visit, stay and live.
What it reported doing in 2024
To fund educational, artistic, scientific and historical activities as it relates to tourism in high point, North Carolina, including but not limited to furniture, textiles and design.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.7%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -300%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.85; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 48.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -60.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $64K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.