High Fives Nonprofit Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264275773
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Truckee, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5305874453
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,698,251
- Expenses
- $4,765,363
- Assets
- $3,158,074
- Liabilities
- $600,386
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROY TUSCANY (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ROY TUSCANY (CEO): $200,716 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
High fives non-profit foundation focuses on preventing life-changing injuries and provides resources and hope if they happen.
What it reported doing in 2024
Empowement fund: the empowerment fund provides financial support and equipment to life-changing injury survivors in the form of board-approved grants for adaptive sports equipment, home/vehicle modifications, the high fives healing network, medical equipment, and emergency care/injury expenses. Life-changing injuries include spinal cord injuries (sci), traumatic brain injuries (tbi), amputations, or other mobility-limiting injuries. Since 2009, the foundation has disbursed nearly 11 million in empowerment funding to over 1,000 traumatic injury survivors in 47 states and territories plus canada. In these 16 years, we've provided 384 adaptive bikes, 157 full sets of skiing equipment, and 54 surf/kiteboards to high fives athletes across north america, enabling survivors to rediscover their identity through sport. Military to the mountain: military to the mountains (m2m) is an adaptive winter sports camp of high fives foundation that introduces 30+ veterans and first responders annually to the healing effects of skiing and snowboarding at renowned resorts in the western u.s. The program initiates with nine weeks of intensive training at the adaptive training foundation in Texas or through city of reno parks and recreation department followed by a week of adaptive winter sports at palisades tahoe in California or solitude mountain resort in Utah. M2m tells the stories of u.s. Veterans and first responders who choose to embrace goal setting and athleticism as a way to enjoy life and all of its challenges. This program, which is 100% free for participants (including travel, lodging, meals, lift tickets, lessons/coaching, adaptive sporting equipment rentals, safety gear, winter sports apparel, and more), demonstrates our deep sense of appreciation for the men and women who serve our country and who have sustained life- changing injuries. 250 veterans and first responders have participated since this program was established in 2015. Adaptive camps: high fives foundation hosts 50-60 adaptive sports camps each year in which we take small groups of adaptive athletes all over the country, from ski resorts in Vermont to mountain bike trails of Nevada to beaches on maui, to hone their skills in five main pillars of sport: fly fishing, motor-fed sports, mountain biking, skiing/snowboarding, and surfing. Since establishment, we've hosted 236 adaptive sports camps with over 750 individuals experiencing a new sport for the first time and 1,650 total participants. Donated services: high fives received donated services totaling 23,780. 250 was for services related to adaptive camps and 23,530 was for legal services related to management and general administration. Neither the income nor the expenses were included in the amounts reported as revenue, expenses, or grants on the tax return.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 61
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.1%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 93.4%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $32.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.1%; rating input score 99; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.4%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.2%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.1% of revenue deployed · 93.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $201K · 18 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.