High Country Supported Living
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 823778854
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Santa Fe, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5056705986
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $102,540
- Expenses
- $136,002
- Assets
- $1,166,971
- Liabilities
- $1,500
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GRETCHEN GROGAN (PRESIDENT)
- PETER DONAHUE (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- GRETCHEN GROGAN (PRESIDENT)
- PETER DONAHUE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LAUREN HENRY (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To create and sustain a community living and learning center for new mexicans of all abilities in a beautiful physical setting where individuals with or without disabilities from the surrounding communities can come together to grow, learn, and share.
What it reported doing in 2024
Day programs: during the summer and fall of 2024 and may and june of 2025, hcsl presented 15 arts and cooking day programs at its property in jacona and for the santa fe public school's kiva (keeping independent visions alive) classroom. Kiva is the sfps's transition-to-work/life skills program for students with learning differences and special needs. Hcsl's fy 2024 day programs were attended by 111 individuals, including 56 adults with an intellectual disability and 55 caregivers and volunteers.hcsl's fy 2024 arts day programs featured visual art, movement/dance and music activities that were inspired by the natural environment of its rural property in jacona. The arts day programs were created by visual artist and educator, lucy ranney, hscl's day programs coordinator, and were designed to be engaging, fun, and appropriate for adults with intellectual disabilities. During hcsl's visual art programs, the participants made felted geode balls that were cut in half to reveal colorful wool layers. They also used dried flowers, leaves and clay tiles to make nature prints; carved apple heads; and decorated fall lanterns with pressed flowers. Hcsl's movement sessions featured a beginner's yoga class and two dance classes where participants moved their bodies to become different shapes and characters they created. During hcsl's 2025 music session, the participants played a variety of percussion instruments and experimented with singing different notes and sounds.hcsl's cooking programs feature fresh vegetables, fruit and herbs from its gardens and orchard. During hcsl's fy 2024 cooking programs, the participants prepared various salads using spring vegetables from the gardens; cooked asian noodle soup with home-made noodles; had a summer pasta party featuring fresh basil pesto sauce; and celebrated the transition to fall with a harvest soup using potatoes, carrots, onions and squash from the gardens.clients from all individuals first in los alamos, as well as clients from santa fe-based agencies, visions case management & consulting, and rise speech and language therapy, participated in hcsl's fy 2024 day programs.other programming events are planned in july, august and the fall of 2025 at hcsl's property in jacona. A program at the santa fe public school's kiva classroom is also planned for the fall of 2025. All hcsl's day programs are free to the participants, making them affordable to a wide range of adults with intellectual disabilities, their family members and caregivers.number of people served: 111 individuals participated in hcsl's arts and cooking programs during fy 2024-2025, including 56 adults with an intellectual disability and 55 caregivers and volunteers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -32.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.58; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -48.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $124K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.