HAPS Alliance
Legal name: High Altitude Platform Station Alliance Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850677780
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Wakefield, MA, USA
- Phone
- 7812460500
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $275,125
- Expenses
- $435,596
- Assets
- $220,689
- Liabilities
- $244,136
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEN RIORDAN (PRESIDENT)
- RUSS VAN DER WERFF (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ANTJE WILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDENT (FROM FEB 2024))
- GREGORY EWERT (VICE PRESIDENT (THRU JAN 2024))
People named in this filing
- KEN RIORDAN (PRESIDENT)
- RUSS VAN DER WERFF (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ANTJE WILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDENT (FROM FEB 2024))
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To accelerate the commercial adoption of High Altitude Platform Station (HAPS) technology through industry-wide standards, interoperability guidelines, and regulatory policies.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024, the haps alliance actively advanced the development and deployment of high altitude platform stations (haps) through a series of strategic publications, events, and organizational initiatives: key publications1. "haps certification pathways" (february 8, 2024): this white paper, developed by the aviation working group, addressed regulatory challenges unique to haps operations. It proposed actions such as establishing safety risk metrics, creating haps-specific environmental test standards, and engaging with international organizations to develop flexible certification processes. 2. "acceptable levels of risks for haps" (january 31, 2024): this paper reimagined traditional aviation safety metrics for haps, introducing new approaches to setting acceptable risk levels for this emerging technology. 3. "creating an enabling regulatory environment for haps deployment" (may 16, 2024): an updated regulatory positions paper providing high-level recommendations to support the stratospheric ecosystem, including insights from the expansion of haps service-link following wrc-23. Notable events-stratospheric operations and research symposium (soars) 2024: this symposium brought together stakeholders from various sectors to collaborate on advancing haps and high altitude long endurance (hale) technologies. Haps alliance members, including aalto, aerostar, aerovironment, and sceye, showcased their collaborative efforts and emphasized the role of haps in revolutionizing aerial operations. -haps alliance member meeting (november 12-13, 2024): held in bonn, germany, and hosted by deutsche telekom ag, this meeting provided a platform for members to explore real-world haps applications, discuss cutting-edge technologies, and participate in working group updates and networking opportunities. Organizational developments-formation of the defense applications working group: in may 2024, the haps alliance launched a new working group focused on providing a platform for equitable discussion and engagement in defense applications amongst members.-formation of the advisory board: in october 2024, the haps alliance established its inaugural advisory board to provide strategic guidance. Greg ewert, chief commercial officer & managing director north america at stratospheric platforms, was appointed as the first member.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -58.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.11; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -11.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -19.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $359K reported
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.