Hideaway Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208523841
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Amarillo, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8063718771
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $248,966
- Expenses
- $297,597
- Assets
- $758,471
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JACK S HUDGINS JR (President)
People named in this filing
- JACK S HUDGINS JR (President)
- JEFFERY D SUMPTER (Secretary)
- MICHAEL C HUGHES (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Hideaway Foundation was organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational, scientific, and literary purposes. Specifically the Hideaway Foundation shall focus its efforts to support pastor and lay person marriage enrichment education, counseling, and related activities directly or through qualified providers. This would include training and education for couples with marriages in crisis that need either intensive marital counseling or other levels of service.Additionally, the Hideaway Foundation shall support workshops, public lectures, and educational seminars related to marriage that are useful to individuals and beneficial to the community. These activities will further the exempt purpose by educating married couples on identifying and learning ways to restore their marriage.It is the Foundation's intent to raise funds from the public and like-minded organizations and churches that desire to maintain marriages. The Foundation will provide financial support, determined
What it reported doing in 2025
The Hideaway Foundation supports the training and education of counselors, pastors, students, and other individuals in marriage related issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 67% for direct work, and 33% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 25
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 69.5%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.68 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.55; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 69.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $207K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $128K reported
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.