Hidden Valley Ranch Property Owner's Association, Inc
Legal name: Hidden Valley Ranch Property Owners Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742862471
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Mission, TX, USA
- Phone
- 956-580-4477
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreation& Sports N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $215,280
- Expenses
- $223,074
- Assets
- $467,797
- Liabilities
- $152,408
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Thomas Klug (President)
- Clara Schiebout (Vice President)
- Timothy Armstrong (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Thomas Klug (President)
- Mark Gurley (Treasurer)
- Rita James (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of Hidden Valley Ranch is to own, manage, and maintain the buildings, common areas, and equipment of the association while providing social and recreational facilities for its members.
What it reported doing in 2025
"During the tax year, Hidden Valley Ranch Property Owners Association, Inc. provided for the management, operation, and maintenance of the common areas and social facilities for a community of 782 residents in 473 homes. This included the upkeep of the 2,400 sq. ft. Recreation Hall, the community swimming pool, and the activity center. The Association organized and facilitated numerous social and recreational programs, including community meals (averaging 118 participants per sitting), Bingo, and seasonal social events (e.g., Valentine's Day and New Year's Eve dances) to promote the social welfare and pleasure of its members. These activities directly fulfill the organization? s mission to provide recreational facilities and social engagement for its membership."
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.2%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 89.9%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.6%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.1; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 93.2% of revenue deployed · 89.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $196K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 18 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX FeesForServicesLegal column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.