Hfc - Ssa

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272327145
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Dearborn, MI, USA
Phone
3133176699
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Labor Unions

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,171
Expenses
$79,744
Assets
$191,758

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JONI MORRIS (PRESIDENT)
  • KIMBERLY KAIER (PRESIDENT -)

People named in this filing

  • JONI MORRIS (PRESIDENT)
  • DELLONDA BRYANT (TREASURER/SE)
  • MICHELLE HILL (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purposes and objectives of the association are to effectively organize all workers eligible for membership and secure collective bargaining for the advancement of its members, implement public support for and interest in henry ford college through close contact and effective cooperation between the association and the community, promote the professional, social, and economic welfare of henry ford college and the sound educational advancement of its students, advance the welfare and professional interests of association members, represent members in negotiations concerning salaries, hours and working conditions, work in cooperation with henry ford college board of trustees and other interested organizations and individuals in endeavors to secure such legislation as will provide adequate financial suuport of the college, and provide a practical means of protecting and advancing the best interest of public institutions of higher education in Michigan and the united states.

What it reported doing in 2025

Organize and support workers eligible for membership and secure collective bargaining for the advancement of the membership

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18.7%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.4; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 25%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.