Hero Junction

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462599242
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Grand Junction, CO, USA
Phone
9702618150
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Recreational l Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,011
Expenses
$1,466
Assets
$1,464

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AMBER PECK (President)

People named in this filing

  • AMBER PECK (President)
  • CODY FLEMING (Secretary)
  • MATTHEW CARSON (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Heroism is "the conduct exhibited in fulfilling or attaining a noble end."Our mission at Hero Junction is to mentor at risk youth in exactly that type of conduct.

What it reported doing in 2018

Heroism is "the conduct exhibited in fulfilling or attaining a noble end." Our mission at Hero Junction is to mentor at risk youth in exactly that type of conduct.We will use CrossFit training to not only improve fitness and nutrition, but also to teach important life skills like responsibility, confidence, hard work, and how to deal with adversity.Each individual will be held accountable through staff supervision and mentoring.We will reach out, through CrossFit, to help improve our local community.We want to give these kids "strength for life"so they can properly deal with every important junction that lies ahead of them.We want to foster in them the strength it will take to become the Heroes of the next generation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -45%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -173.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -73.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -25.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.