Hermosa Montessori School

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860873390
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Tucson, AZ, US
Phone
(520) 749-5518
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,921,578
Expenses
$2,961,917
Assets
$1,903,162
Liabilities
$118,095

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHEILA STOLOV (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRIS MONTGOMERY (MEMBER): $94,141 total reported compensation
  • THERESA GARRONE (MEMBER): $73,845 total reported compensation
  • SHEILA STOLOV (PRESIDENT & CEO): $54,225 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hermosa Montessori School's mission is to provide an authentic Montessori education that fosters academic excellence, personal growth, and a love of learning in a nurturing, natural environment.

What it reported doing in 2024

Hermosa students participate in state mandated testing along with all public school students. As a measure of success, hermosa consistently excels in scoring an 'a' rating, the highest rank Arizona awards to schools. These high test scores are consistently achieved without a "test driven" curriculum. Unlike many other schools, our students don't spend the majority of their days practicing for the test. The school's educational approach is designed not only to teach children basic skills and information. Our program focuses on "growing good people" through our strong virtue program and curriculum. A variety of extracurricular programs that range from music, choir, art, cooking, gardening, martial arts, drama, chess, yoga, football, and wiffle ball enhance student opportunities and the communityour peer tutoring program further enhances the collaborative spirit within our school community. Older students are paired with younger ones, creating a supportive network where knowledge is shared and friendships are forged. This program not only strengthens academic skills but also nurtures a sense of mentorship and camaraderie among our students. Additionally, hermosa montessori school takes pride in its commitment to individualized instruction. Recognizing that each student is unique, our educators tailor their teaching methods to cater to the specific needs and learning styles of each child. This personalized approach ensures that every student receives the attention and guidance necessary to thrive academically and personally. These programs, integrated seamlessly into our montessori education framework, contribute to the holistic development of our students, aligning with our non-profit mission to nurture self-motivated, moral, social, and environmentally responsible individuals. Through gardening, peer tutoring, and individualized instruction, hermosa montessori school continues to make a lasting impact on the lives of our students, preparing them for a future of lifelong learning and success.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 65
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.4%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 77.8%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $20,305.86 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 40%; rating input score 40; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.4%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 79.4% of revenue deployed · 77.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $94K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.