Heritage of Jacob Peru Mission
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 450955497
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Delta, CO, USA
- Phone
- 9708741682
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Relief
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $30,597
- Expenses
- $33,839
- Assets
- $13,453
- Liabilities
- $348
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- James Anderson (President)
People named in this filing
- Jay Alsdorf (Secretary)
- James Anderson (President)
- Joyce Daniel (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Heritage of Jacob Peru Mission (HJPM) exists to provide funding with accountability, and consultation opportunities, helping to make it possible for Peruvian Christians to establish communities of family homes for orphaned, abandoned, and abused children, victims of sexual abuse and family violence. We are partnering with mature, sincerely devoted Peruvian Christians to establish, lead and participate in, and perpetuate, the work of this international partnership.
What it reported doing in 2025
Vocational training in sewing is offered at no cost to women and adolescent girls in two locations. 50 students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.2%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 55.3%; rating input score 55
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.6%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 26.9%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -18.6% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -23.8% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.2% of revenue deployed · 55.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $19K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.