Heritage & Hope

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
392257181
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Collegedale, TN, United States
Phone
4233397020
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religious Media, Communications
Affiliation
Religious (unspecified)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$90,372
Expenses
$7,864
Assets
$91,372

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALEXANDER BOWEN (President)

People named in this filing

  • ALEXANDER BOWEN (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

At Heritage & Hope, we are dedicated to proclaiming the Three Angels' Message of Revelation 14 with unwavering commitment to truth and relevance; our ministry focuses on the deep examination of historic books and documents, diligent study of scripture and prophecies, and thoughtful analysis of current events to prepare individuals for the final days as prophesied in the Bible. Our hearts are set on uplifting the Lord in everything we do, and we’re passionate about sharing His love with those around us. Our mission is simple: to live out the Great Commission and make a difference wherever we can. We work as a team, supporting each other as we create content and speak at events, both together and individually. Our prayer is that by combining our unique talents, knowledge, and skills, the Lord multiplies the impact for His glory. Heritage & Hope Ministries is a registered 501(c)(3)...

What it reported doing in 2025

Primarily produce youtube videos, which are mostly of a podcast-style and discuss the Bible, prophecy, and current events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 43
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 8.7%; rating input score 9
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 91.3%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.62; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 8.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.