Hephzibah Children's Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 362167096
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Oak Park, IL, USA
- Phone
- 7086497100
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,235,740
- Expenses
- $13,569,389
- Assets
- $18,352,369
- Liabilities
- $3,706,296
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER ELLIS-JACKSON (PRESIDENT)
- DONNA ROLF (VICE PRESIDENT - PRESIDENT ELECT)
- JASON PATENAUDE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- NANCY DORFMAN-SCHWARTZ (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $167,209 total reported compensation
- MICHELLE ANDERSON (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $151,725 total reported compensation
- JULIE DVORSKY (DIRECTOR OF FAMILY BASED SERVICES): $141,363 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A child welfare agency providing group home care, foster care, and daycare services to help children thrive and families flourish through innovative, community based programs.
What it reported doing in 2024
Sibling camphephzibah coordinates an annual sibling camp for youth in our program, ages six years and older, that are separated in care from their siblings. This is a three-night, four-day camp that takes placed at camp whitcomb mason in hartland, Wisconsin. Sibling camp is important in creating a sense of connection and continuity between siblings, helping to build positive childhood memories, and encouraging confidence and self-esteem. Most importantly, sibling camp allows the children to just be kids, unencumbered by their past and have a wonderful time participating in activities that all children should have a chance to experience. Through sibling connections made and strengthened at the camp and at other times throughout the year, the youth maintain valuable links to their family, which is so important in bringing hope and happiness to the children.intact family servicesthe intact family services program is designed to make "reasonable efforts" to stabilize, strengthen, enhance, and preserve family life by providing services that enable children to remain safely at home. This program assists families to meet minimum parenting standards through professional assessment of the families' problems and the provision of necessary services. The families in this program are referred from the division of child protection (dcp) through the department of children and family services. Hephzibah's intact program provides services to the cook central region of the department. Our contract capacity is 100 families at any given time, and the caseload ratio is 10:1. Positive parenting program (triple p)hephzibah provides an evidence-based model of intervention called positive parenting program (triple p). Triple p is a parenting intervention with the main goals of increasing the knowledge, skills, and confidence of parents and reducing the prevalence of mental health, emotional, and behavioral problems in children. The age range for children being served by this program is from 6-12 years. The triple p curriculum has the parents focus on one child in their household that they struggle with the most.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 79% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.5%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 81.4%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.35; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.5% of revenue deployed · 81.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $11.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $167K · 22 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.