Henry Fernandez Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

6 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

To spread the word of Jesus Christ.

To spread the word of Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour through preaching, teaching, fellowship and TV/radio broadcasts.

Revenue model: Affiliate-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: 91%; rating input score 91; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Independent voting board: 40%; rating input score 40; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: 6.1%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 6.05; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 35.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 2 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $632K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $412K · 6 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed
Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 40/100.
Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.