Henry County United Way Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

6 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Funding for nonprofit groups

Provide financial support to 25+ tax exempt organizations that provide various services to the general public. Held fundraising campaign.

Revenue model: Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: 68.5%; rating input score 68; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: -23.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -28.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $136K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $4K · 6 people listed
Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2012
Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.