Hennepin Healthcare
Legal name: Hennepin Healthcare System Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 421707837
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 612-873-6963
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,709,796,054
- Expenses
- $1,719,315,271
- Assets
- $816,695,986
- Liabilities
- $817,579,535
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER DECUBELLIS MA (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- THERESA PESCH RN (VP PHILANTHROPY HHF PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- THOMAS BERGMAN MD (PHYSICIAN DIVISION CHAIR): $1,214,250 total reported compensation
- WALTER GALICICH MD (PHYSICIAN-MANAGING): $1,108,110 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER DECUBELLIS MA (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $1,007,646 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We partner with our community, our patients, and their families to ensure access to outstanding care for everyone while improving health and wellness through teaching, patient and community education, and research. East Lake Clinic team members are here to create a healing environment and to support you and your family during and after your pregnancy. For a healthy pregnancy, you can receive prenatal care via Centering group visits, one on one visits with family medicine providers, or via visits with a midwife. CenteringPregnancy®") is prenatal care in a group format with 8-12 other pregnant patients over 10 weeks. See our East Lake OB team handout with pictures and bios below, which is also available at our front desk for a full list of all who take part in your healthy prenatal care journey.
What it reported doing in 2024
Patient care: hennepin healthcare system inc, (hereafter hhs) is a nationally recognized healthcare system that includes a comprehensive clinic system, level 1 adult and pediatric trauma center, and medical center with the largest emergency department in Minnesota, ems service, and a nurse home visiting program. Hhs is also recognized nationally for leadership in medical education, emergency preparedness, research, and compassionate care in multiple specialties. Hhs operated a hospital with licensed capacity of 894 beds and 65 bassinets, 469 beds and 65 bassinets of which were available, as well as 10 primary care clinics and 34 specialty care clinics, and employed approximately 975 providers, 247 residents, and 160 pharmacists in 9 pharmacy locations. Hhs is a major employer and economic engine in hennepin county of Minnesota. The clinic and specialty center (csc) outpatient facility in downtown minneapolis reaffirms hennepin healthcare systems inc.'s (hhs) commitment to partnering with its community, patients, and their families to ensure access to outstanding care for everyone, while improving health and wellness through teaching, patient and community education, and research. Hhs invests in training and supporting its team members to serve the entire community in the belief that equity is essential for optimal health outcomes. Hhs works to improve the ability of historically marginalized and socioeconomically disadvantaged persons to receive the resources needed to be as healthy as possible. Hhs partners with the community, both internal and external, to support achieving their fullest health potential by actively eliminating barriers to access due to racism, or any other consequence of social position or socially influenced circumstances experienced by black, indigenous, and people of color, and those who are economically disadvantaged, uninsured, indigent, and members of other vulnerable populations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 85
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.5%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 89.2%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 12.5%; rating input score 12; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.7%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 89.5% of revenue deployed · 89.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.5B in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 30 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $43.1M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 41 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 25 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.