Helping Souls of North America
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 882403551
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Beaverton, OR, USA
- Phone
- 8457296705
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,224
- Expenses
- $764
- Assets
- $11,688
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Padmashri Gargesa (President)
People named in this filing
- Gopalakrishnan Sriram (Board of Directors)
- Madhurasmitha Chakravarthy (Board of Directors)
- Thimmappa Anekonda (Board of Directors)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a group of like minded friends passionate about making a difference to the community. Our objective is to bring together members of the community, irrespective of region, religion, economic status and nationality, to work seamlessly towards common causes highlighted by the identified strategic initiatives. These are a few of the key social welfare initiatives we have identified at the moment. * Health & Well-being * Education * Environment * Youth Club * Women/Girl Empowerment * Animal Welfare * Food & Nutrition Cultural and Creativity
What it reported doing in 2025
Expenses for Cultural & Creativity
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 23.7%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 76.3%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.3; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -27.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -23.2% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 34.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 23.7% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 13 filed program accomplishments · $763 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.