Helping Every Animal Receive Treatment Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 994655365
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Annapolis, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4109278900
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Veterinary Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $378,337
- Expenses
- $64,117
- Assets
- $314,220
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Robin Catlett (President)
People named in this filing
- Robin Catlett (President)
- Doreen Coates (Treasurer)
- Theresa Hutchinson (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We operate a mobile veterinary clinic that is both able and willing to provide services across Maryland. We collaborate with local community organizations with climate-controlled buildings as recovery areas for animals after surgery. Our core team has more than 40 years of combined shelter experience.
What it reported doing in 2025
We purchased and obtained equipment and supplies for our 26 foot Mobile Veterinary Clinic. This is a used Mobile Veterinary Clinic and in 2025 we set up the surgery suite and the prep area. We provided 2 free vaccinations clinics in the Eastport area of Annapolis. The vaccinations administered included Rabies Vaccinations, DHLPP (Dog Distemper/ParvoLeplo) and FVRCP(Feline Rhinotracheitis/Distemper vaccine). Our advertising for these events targeted individuals who are less likely to have regular veterinary care for their pet. We provided free vaccinations to over 80 animals and many of the people who came signed up to be contacted once we were able to provide spay/neuter services. We obtained our MD state veterinary hospital license in December 2025. We performed one High Volume High Quality Spay/Neuter clinic in coordination with Laurel City Recs & Parks
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 17%; rating input score 17
- Program expense ratio: 99.5%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: $1,828 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 83.1%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.9; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 17% of revenue deployed · 99.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $64K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.