HelpAge USA

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431750256
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2011
Forms available
Form 990 2011
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2027141119
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$656,287
Expenses
$589,070
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

HelpAge USA, Inc. (HelpAge USA), an affiliate of HelpAge International, builds awareness of global aging issues among US audiences, advocates for the empowerment of older, vulnerable adults in the developing world; and raises funds to support the programs of the HelpAge network.

What it reported doing in 2011

Haiti: The overall objective of HelpAge USA's response is to foster the dignified survival of older people affected by the earthquake in Haiti. HelpAge has provided age-appropriate assistance and support to ensure the best possible recovery and rehabilitation. HelpAge USA is committed to a 2-3 year engagement in the aftermath of the earthquake, carrying on through the reconstruction phase. For the first six months, the focus was on meeting the emergency needs of older people and on building longer-term capacity and capability.The phase 1 response was divided into four key areas of work (outputs):1. Older people affected by the earthquake received emergency relief (food and non-food items) to enable survival with dignity.2. Older people affected by the earthquake received appropriate healthcare including mental health support.3. Older people living in care homes have an adequate standard of care in the emergency and recovery periods.4. The most vulnerable older people living at home or in temporary shelter/accommodation received home care and support.In addition to any required continuation of phase 1 activities, phase 2 will include:1. Further work with larger scale agencies and the UN cluster system to ensure older people's needs are fully recognized in the rehabilitation and reconstruction program.2. Reconstruction and/or repair of care homes and other institutions identified in phase 1 along with staff training and other inputs required to place these institutions in a long term sustainable situation.3. Continued development of Older People's Associations (OPAs) to address identified needs around issues such as access to health services, livelihoods and shelter.4. Possible development of a home and/or community care program for vulnerable older people to compliment government services.5. Disaster risk reduction programs with partners and OPAs relating to risks such as deforestation, flooding, hurricanes and future earthquakes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 66
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.2%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $359K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $143K · 11 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.