Help Tuck Them In Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 992708523
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Tracy, MN, USA
- Phone
- 5076264583
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $36,814
- Expenses
- $15,618
- Assets
- $21,196
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Lori Alf (President)
- Joe Buyck (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Lori Alf (President)
- Joe Buyck (Vice President)
- Jeff Alf (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to make sure that every child in our community has a bed to sleep in. We don't realize what a good night's sleep can do for a child mentally, physically, socially. We provide a wood framed twin size bed, a mattress, a sheet protector, set of sheets, a comforter, a pillow, stuffed animal, and a reading book. All these items are delivered to children that do not have beds and at no cost to the family.We work with all the social workers, school districts, hospitals, fire departments, ambulance departments, some of the organizations that we are with are Southwest Health and Human Services, WRAP (WoMen's Ruraul Advocay Programs), Child Protective Serivces, domestic violence, foster care, and many others.Children cannot help the situations that they are born into. It is not a child's fault the hand that has dealt them. So, if we can make their life even a little bit better by giving them a place to lay their head at night, it is all worth it.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024, the Organization was able to deliver around 150 beds and 16 cribs, by far surpassing any expectations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 42.4%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 57.6%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.36; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 42.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.