Help Tuck Them In Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
992708523
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Tracy, MN, USA
Phone
5076264583
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,814
Expenses
$15,618
Assets
$21,196

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lori Alf (President)
  • Joe Buyck (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Lori Alf (President)
  • Joe Buyck (Vice President)
  • Jeff Alf (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to make sure that every child in our community has a bed to sleep in. We don't realize what a good night's sleep can do for a child mentally, physically, socially. We provide a wood framed twin size bed, a mattress, a sheet protector, set of sheets, a comforter, a pillow, stuffed animal, and a reading book. All these items are delivered to children that do not have beds and at no cost to the family.We work with all the social workers, school districts, hospitals, fire departments, ambulance departments, some of the organizations that we are with are Southwest Health and Human Services, WRAP (WoMen's Ruraul Advocay Programs), Child Protective Serivces, domestic violence, foster care, and many others.Children cannot help the situations that they are born into. It is not a child's fault the hand that has dealt them. So, if we can make their life even a little bit better by giving them a place to lay their head at night, it is all worth it.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, the Organization was able to deliver around 150 beds and 16 cribs, by far surpassing any expectations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 42.4%; rating input score 42
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 57.6%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.36; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 42.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.