Help Animals India
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263681514
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2012, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- Lake Forest Park, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2065368900
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $610,628
- Expenses
- $591,645
- Assets
- $130,504
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Eileen Weintraub (Founding Director): $33,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Help Animals India is a 501c3 organization dedicated to improving the lives and welfare of animals by providing financial and consultation to support and build capacity of animal rescue groups in India and Nepal while connecting donors with the most promising and needful groups, ensuring donors' support is spent responsibly and effectively, and thereby cultivating a culture of compassion for all animals
What it reported doing in 2025
Sarnath we supported a one-month spay/neuter, vaccination, and rescue camp in Sarnath and surrounding villages. Through this initiative, we provided essential care to over 700 dogs, ensuring their well-being and reducing stray animal overpopulation by carrying out spay/ neuter and vaccination. Additionally, we conducted education and awareness programs, reaching over 2,000 schoolchildren, fostering a compassionate and informed community for animal welfare. This impactful support has helped create a safer and healthier environment for both animals and people, and we deeply appreciate Help Animals India's commitment to this cause.Sarnath Animal Welfare (SAW) is a project offshoot of Help Animals India project in nearby Varanasi through HOPE and Animal rust. Each year we send funding for spay/neuter/vaccination of area's dogs. The operations at Sarnath are carried out through Varanasi for Animals. Distance from Our Shelter and Sarnath village is about 10 Kilometers. We have been regularly called by the groups and individuals for all the injured animals. With our Mobile Support Ambulance every month we set up Sterilization camp. We ran Education and Awareness Drive as well through Schools and in the communities. Every year we run a special program for Sarnath in association with Sarnath Animal Welfare Group and Brigitte Bardot Fondation, Under this drive, we Re Vaccinate the already operated dogs and sterilize the non neutered dogs. For past over 7 years the drive is going on in Sarnath that has helped a lot in controlling the dog population and reduced the risk of Rabies. Being a major tourist place for Lord Buddha, We put in lot of efforts to continue the efforts as and when required from carrying out sterilization to rescues. Through our Education and Awareness drive during the special program we educated 1200 students, 60 Teachers, 200 Children and about 400 Adult community members. We plan to continue our efforts in making controlled dog population in and around Sarnath, making sure that there are less dog bites from the region and also work towards ZERO BY 30 Goal of WHO. we encourage more participation from owned dog population, run aggressive and influential education and awareness campaign using village heads and/ or influential people to get owned free roaming dog population go through spay/ neuter program. We have been continuously supporting the injured and sick animals in between the camp.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.8%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $103.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 96.5%; rating input score 97; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.1%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.6%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.8% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 27 filed program accomplishments · $542K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $33K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.