Hellgate Band Parents Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810440087
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Missoula, MT, USA
Phone
4064931471
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$51,244
Expenses
$30,616
Assets
$57,224

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIKA HICKEY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ERIKA HICKEY (PRESIDENT)
  • AARON GINGERELLI (VICE PRESIDE)
  • JENNIFER PHAM (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The hellgate band parents organization exists to provide support for and funding in addition to normal school provided funding for hellgate band programs.

What it reported doing in 2023

In 2023, the hellgate band parents, inc. Organization raised 16,884 to contribute to studentss travel accounts, enabling students to travel and perform around the state of Montana as well as to plan for further performances around the united states. Other program service accomplishments include 4,339 in financial support of the hellgate marching band and pep band, and sponsorship of the Montana all-state jazz festival. The organization also helped finance the jazz band guest artist series which brings professional jazz musicians to hellgate high school helping to further enrich the students' musical education.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 79% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53.3%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40.3%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.87; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -54.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 44% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53.3% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $27K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.