Helios Education Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942850977
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Phoenix, AZ, US
Phone
(602) 381-2260
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Financial Institutions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$52,419,531
Expenses
$39,635,771
Assets
$879,721,019
Liabilities
$32,962,493

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAUL LUNA (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
  • BARBARA RYAN THOMPSON (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & COO)
  • MICHAEL CHESIN (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT & CFO)
  • LAUREN M CORTINAS (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, COMMUNICATIONS)

Highest reported compensation

  • PAUL LUNA (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $724,642 total reported compensation
  • BARBARA RYAN THOMPSON (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & COO): $529,620 total reported compensation
  • MICHAEL CHESIN (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT & CFO): $462,639 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To create opportunities for individuals to succeed in postsecondary education.

What it reported doing in 2024

Helios education foundation is dedicated to creating opportunities for individuals in Arizona and Florida to achieve a postsecondary education. The foundation's work is driven by its four fundamental beliefs: 1) community - education changes lives and strengthens communities. 2) investment - education is an investment, not an expense. 3) equity - every student, regardless of zip code, deserves a high- quality education. 4) partnership - the foundation will achieve its mission through partnership and collaboration. Helios invests in programs and initiatives across the full education continuum, from early grade success through postsecondary education. Helios partners with universities, colleges, elementary and secondary schools, and other eligible educational organizations as described in section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. The foundation's commitment to education is long-term and its financial support is focused on investing in sustainable programs and initiatives at educational organizations that specifically impact the educational success of all students. During fy25, the foundation provided approximately $20 million in grants and $975 thousand in in-kind giving to educational organizations located in Arizona and Florida. This funding and in-kind giving provided support to schools, universities, and other educational organizations and non-profits that improve the conditions of and access to education. Helios education foundation has a purposeful focus on results. Our impact strategy focuses on three key drivers essential to getting students on track for college attainment: ensure that students are reading by the third grade; increase college enrollments; and increase attainment of two- and four-year college degrees.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 61% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 67
  • Accountability: 87
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.9%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 81.8%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.4%; rating input score 99; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 76.9%; rating input score 77; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.4%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 22.2; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 60.9% of revenue deployed · 81.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $32.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $725K · 25 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.6M reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 103 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 78 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.