Heirborn Servants Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814673583
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Cumming, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4049362047
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $365,432
- Expenses
- $352,520
- Assets
- $471,128
- Liabilities
- $2,830
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- JONATHAN R LEWIS (EXECUTIVE DI): $96,637 total reported compensation
- LESLEY LEWIS (SECRETARY): $40,571 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Give hope - this year, we extended our reach to serve communities in ukraine, poland and austria. Through partnerships with 3 churches and 4 nonprofits, we were able to interact with and impact over 800 individuals who have been displaced by war, victims of trafficking, widows and orphans. Driven by compassion, give hope offers personalized enouragement through in-personal interactions and pastorial care. We collaborate with trusted partners to address the needs of vulnerable individuals, connecting them to local community centers, churches, and vetted community partners for assistance with food, shelter, daycare, trauma treatment and transportation. Give rides - provides a strategic service deemed essential for single moms in the u.s. We offer safe, reliable transportation, which is a critical barrier for many of these women. For 2025, we made an incredible impact on 256 single moms and 293 children providing 9 cars, 2 vehicle repairs and 573 lyft rides in the greater atlanta area. Th
What it reported doing in 2025
Demonstrate compassion, take action, and advocates for vulnerable individuals who have survived trauma and find themselves in disparate circumstances. Raises awareness of human trafficking, domestic violence and related trauma while serving communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 44
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.7%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 89.7%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $35.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 49.9%; rating input score 50; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.5%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 38.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.6% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.7% of revenue deployed · 89.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $316K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $97K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.