San Francisco Campus for Jewish Living

Overview

Mission

To provide older adults with comprehensive and innovative care that fosters purpose, dignity and joy. Community _(Kehillah):_** Connection and collective responsibility to care for and support one another. Excellence _(Yitztainut):_** Performing all our actions with intention and the highest quality of care. Our Mission. Our history can be traced back to 1871 when the Pacific Hebrew Orphan Asylum and Home Society were incorporated “to found and maintain an asylum for orphan children” and “to establish and support a Home for aged and infirm Israelites.” In 1872, the Society purchased the site at Silver and Mission, constructing a rambling two-story wooden Victorian building. In 1891, the doors opened to 12 residents. The old wooden structure was replaced in 1923 with a red brick Roman-pillared building. Designed by Samuel Lightner Hyman, a prominent and prolific San Francisco...

Operating model

Revenue model

Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.

Distribution model

Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

• Financial Efficiency: 86
• Transparency & Controls: 86
• Accountability: 100
• Sustainability: 28
• Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Details

• What they do: 1 operating location identified
• Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
• Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
• Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $125.8M in reported program spending
• Leadership: top reported pay $786K · 32 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
• Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $11.1M reported
• Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
• Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
• Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
• Contacts: How to reach this organization
• Money network: 15 filed money-flow records
• Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
• Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
• People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

• High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
• Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
• Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
• Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
• Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.