Hebrew Health Care Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043750515
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
West Hartford, CT, USA
Phone
8602182300
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance
Affiliation
Judaism

Reported finances

Revenue
$57,182
Expenses
$1,214,121
Assets
$3,166,478
Liabilities
$5,939,929

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DENISE PETERSON (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • DENISE PETERSON (PRESIDENT & CEO): $598,380 total reported compensation
  • AVA PANNULLO (PHYSICIAN): $311,341 total reported compensation
  • MADELENE FRANCESE (VP DEVELOPMENT): $171,102 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. We assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see schedule o).hebrew health care is a non-sectarian organization proud of its historical roots in the jewish community. We maintain traditional jewish practice while welcoming and embracing diversity. We respect the importance of the need for individual choice as essential to providing quality services. We acknowledge that spirituality is an important dimension of wellbeing. We assure informed, dignified quality care to all regardless of source of payment for service. Finally, we strive to earn the trust of all whom we serve by living our mission, vision and core values.

What it reported doing in 2024

Administrative support. Hebrew health care provides administrative support to hebrew home and hospital, inc., hebrew community services, inc., hebrew life choices, inc. And hebrew health care foundation, inc. That administrative support includes monitoring and support of programs within these corporate affiliates, as well as direct supervision and support to management within each corporation, by the ceo and cfo of hebrew health care, inc.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 67% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 17%; rating input score 17
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2,023.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.61; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.88; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 102.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -16.1% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 17% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $206K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $598K · 12 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.