Heavenly Pizza Np Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
921167911
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Tiffin, OH, USA
Phone
4194481427
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$65,404
Expenses
$14,042
Assets
$59,602

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEAN DISTEL (President)
  • DALE DEPEW (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • DEAN DISTEL (President)
  • DALE DEPEW (Vice President)
  • PAT DEMONTE (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

At Heavenly Pizza Gives Back we are driven by the love of Christ to serve our community through generous giving and supoort. We strive to uplift and empower those in need, reflecting our commitment to faith, values and the abundant love of Christ.Our primary purpose is to establish an inclusive family entertainment center where people can gather in a place and enjoy the outdoors while engaging in fun and recreational activites.

What it reported doing in 2025

To provide a safe, accessible park setting for people of all ages and abilities, including a playground for children, fun activities for youth and adults along with a small stage area that allows for family-friendly programs and performances for the entire community . The Heavenly Park will be located in a low-to-moderate income neighborhood and close to a Senior Living Apartment complex, a HUD Section-8 facility consisting of 90+ units, and within walking distance of the two (2) universities and two (2) local high schools, making this park an intergenerational gathering spot.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 19.6%; rating input score 20
  • Program expense ratio: 91.3%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 78.5%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.24; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 19.6% of revenue deployed · 91.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.