Joan Hunter Ministries
Legal name: Hearts 4 Him Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 752906407
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Tomball, TX, US
- Phone
- 281-789-7500
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Religion Related N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Religious (unspecified)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,393,858
- Expenses
- $2,746,028
- Assets
- $1,460,186
- Liabilities
- $136,581
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOAN HUNTER (PRESIDENT)
- KELLEY MURRELL (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOAN HUNTER (PRESIDENT)
- KELLEY MURRELL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CATHERINE WOOD (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Joan Hunter Ministries exists to equip believers to take the Healing Power of God outside the 4 walls of the church and into the 4 corners of the earth. Joan Hunter Ministries partners with missionaries that are serving around the world. From right here in Texas, to Mexico, Haiti, Canada, Israel, Cambodia, “Saving Moses”, and more! We consistently give and send support to help these organizations reach, rebuild and rescue the lost, broken, and at risk people of all ages. > “The world of the generous gets larger and larger…” > Prov. 11:24. We Exist to equip believers to take the Healing Power of God outside the 4 walls of the church to the 4 corners of the earth. We believe that through the blood of Jesus and in His name there is healing for the believer’s Body, Soul, Mind, Emotions, and Finances. Take a moment and Consider Donating or Partnering with what God is doing through this...
What it reported doing in 2025
Teaching and ministring in churches, homes groups, on television, at organization facility and on radio, at conventions, hospital, through websites, newsletters, books, dvds and cds in the USA and through out the world.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 59
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91.8%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14.7%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.