Mosaic Life Care

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
440545289
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
St. Joseph, MO, US
Phone
(816) 271-6000
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$883,407,770
Expenses
$825,585,917
Assets
$582,352,118
Liabilities
$94,895,728

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • John M Poore (Director/President/CEO)
  • Gene A Claycomb (President of Mosaic Medical Center)
  • Mark Laney MD (Former Director/President/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Rony M Abou-Jawde MD (Staff Physician): $2,231,368 total reported compensation
  • Jonathan Amspacher MD (Staff Physician): $1,782,571 total reported compensation
  • John M Poore (Director/President/CEO): $1,634,941 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To put the needs of the patient first while empowering a culture where caregivers bring their best, ensuring a healthier future for generations to come.

What it reported doing in 2024

Heartland regional medical center (mosaic-st. Joseph) is a 348-bed medical surgical hospital located in st. Joseph, Missouri. It serves a community of 105,000 residents. Because st. Joseph is a border city, it also provides services to those living in the adjacent states of Kansas, Nebraska and Iowa. The economy of the region is based on agriculture, minor manufacturing and small businesses resulting in a payor mix for mosaic-st. Joseph approximately 71.45% governmental or self-pay patients. 10.9% of the population have income that is below the federal poverty level. Mosaic-st. Joseph provides a wide range of inpatient and outpatient services including cardio-thoracic, vascular, orthopedic and general surgeries, mental health services, along with a full array of diagnostic and therapeutic services. It operates a 24-hour emergency room designated as a trauma ii center by the state of Missouri. Mosaic-st. Joseph's obstetrics department provides 18 labor, delivery, recovery and post-partum beds which are also designated as a level ii center. The hospital provides radiation oncology services, home health visits and hospice care. The organization is a member of the mayo network for clinical consultations. During the year, approximately 15,000 patients were admitted to the hospital resulting in approximately 68,900 patient days. A total of approximately 10,000 surgeries were performed, the emergency room served approximately 53,300 patients and approximately 192,300 visits were generated by outpatients. In fy2025, the outpatient visits methodology was revised to only include clinic provider visits within a specified cpt range. Mosaic-st. Joseph employs approximately 4,200 full-time equivalent care givers. The medical staff includes approximately 334 providers covering primary care and specialty clinics for approximately 23 locations throughout the region. There were approximately 389,000 clinic patient visits during the year. Other program services: mosaic-st. Joseph has a 340b designation from health resources and services administration (federal government). This allows the medical center to receive outpatient drugs at reduced prices from the drug manufacturers. The 340b program enables covered entities to stretch scarce federal resources as far as possible, reaching more eligible patients and providing more comprehensive services. The program is available to hospitals that provide care for a disproportionate number of patients that range from no income to low income.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 59
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.4%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 87%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 85.8%; rating input score 86; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 46.2%; rating input score 46; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.5%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.3%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 81.4% of revenue deployed · 87% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $718.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $2.2M · 27 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $7.5M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 45 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 46 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 46/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.