Heartland Habitat for Humanity Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 481041839
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015
- Location
- Kansas City, KS, USA
- Phone
- 9136342304
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,053,530
- Expenses
- $2,733,185
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tom Lally (President & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Tom Lally (President & CEO): $98,341 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To create decent, affordable housing for those in need
What it reported doing in 2015
Affordable Housing - Simple, decent affordable homes and communities for families in need. The organization started 3 new homes and completed 3 new homes to be sold at no profit added and zero percent interest loans to qualifying low-income families. During the year, the organization sold 3 new homes. This program involved more than 1,101 community volunteers in the effort to build simple, decent, affordable homes and to rebuild these inner city neighborhoods. Cost of homes sold of $487,928 was netted against gross revenue of $485,054 in the revenue amount above.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.5%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 78.8%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.5%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.6%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -39.3% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.5% of revenue deployed · 78.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $98K · 16 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $302K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2012 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.