Heart to Serve Missions
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922445634
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- White Sulphur Springs, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3045369258
- Rating
- 96
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $52,426
- Expenses
- $53,263
- Assets
- $15,229
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- John Burns (President)
People named in this filing
- John Burns (President)
- Clinton Cole (Board Member)
- Michael Waid (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Heart to Serve Missions is dedicated to serving people around the world through the love of Jesus Christ by meeting physical, emotional, and spiritual needs. Heart to serve Missions supplies poverty stricken areas with clean water wells, food, housing, funds for medical care, Bibles, goats, bicycles, classes, flood relief, school assistance, and also prayer for the less fortunate around the world.
What it reported doing in 2024
Liberia School Feeding Program fed the children who attend school in a community in Liberia everyday that they were in school for one school year. There are approximately 300 children who attend the school. Liberia Housing Projects provided two poverty stricken families with a stable home structure to live in. This helped them to have a safe place to have protection from the elements. The two structures housed approximately 15 people. Uganda Economic Relief provided 100 Bibles, 30 goats, 15 bicycles, flood relief, food, soccer balls for children, and essentials for living to poverty stricken communities in Uganda. This helped a total of approximately 400 people. Liberia School Roof provided safe shelter to approximately 300 students. Uganda Emergency Medical fund was able to help pay for doctors to treat cases of malaria and other life threatening illnesses. Liberia Emergency medical fund was able to pay for the doctors to treat people with life threatening infections, some of which had been left untreated for years. These emergency medical funds have helped approximately 15 people. Feeding the disabled Community was able to provide food for a community of approximately 40 disabled people for a year so they didn't have to struggle to find food. Liberia school tuition provided school funds for 9 students whose families couldn't afford to send them. Pakistan feeding a widow provided food for a woman who lost her husband who was also the provider of income. Pakistan well project provided a safe water well to 2 villages of approximately 1000 people. Pakistan sewing classes provided 10 Pakistan women with a means to make their own income by learning how to sew instead of being forced into marriages outside their religious views. Pakistan feeding provided food to poverty stricken people.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99.7%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.1%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.6%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 103.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 46.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 99.7% of revenue deployed · 98.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $52K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.