Heart of New England Council Bsa Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
042349692
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Rutland, MA, USA
Phone
9785343532
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Boy Scouts of America

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,566,222
Expenses
$2,614,311
Assets
$5,208,436
Liabilities
$1,204,096

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

35 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID BOSSELAIT (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KEVIN KEARNEY (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARK BARBERNITZ (SCOUT EXECUTIVE): $140,611 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, the heart of new england council made a meaningful impact by serving over 4,600 boys and girls across central Massachusetts through its cub scouts, scouts bsa, venturing, and exploring programs. These co-educational initiatives are designed to offer hands-on learning experiences, fostering leadership, responsibility, and resilience in young people.throughout the year, the council prioritized youth leadership development, with more than 200 scouts taking part in structured leadership training, including national youth leadership training (nylt). These programs emphasized building confidence, personal responsibility, strong team dynamics, and ethical decision-making.in service to the community, scouts contributed over 20,000 hours of volunteer work, participating in activities such as food drives, environmental cleanups, veterans' support projects, and emergency preparedness education. These efforts reflect the council's deep commitment to nurturing civic-minded youth.outdoor education and character building remained at the heart of the council's mission, as more than 2,500 youth attended council-sponsored camping and outdoor adventure programs. Summer resident camps at camp wanocksett in dublin, nh, and treasure valley scout reservation in rutland, ma, provided opportunities for self-reliance, physical fitness, and the cultivation of environmental stewardship.the exploring program introduced over 35 middle and high school youth to hands-on experiences with local professionals in fields like aviation and fire/ems. This approach to career-based learning not only supports workforce development but also helps young people acquire practical, real-world skills.in its commitment to inclusion and access, the council awarded over $75,000 in financial assistance, ensuring that all youthregardless of economic circumstancecould fully participate in scouting. Outreach initiatives extended the benefits of scouting to underserved communities in both urban and rural areas across worcester county and beyond.in summary, scouting in central Massachusetts continues to empower young people with the tools they need to become future leaders of character. By emphasizing leadership, service, outdoor learning, and inclusion, the heart of new england council remains steadfast in its mission to help youth grow into responsible, prepared, and active citizens.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 93
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.2%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 92.9%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: $17.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 97.1%; rating input score 97; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.7%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.99; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.2% of revenue deployed · 92.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 33 of 34 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $141K · 35 people listed
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.