Healthy You Healthy Us

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842100656
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Marietta, GA, USA
Phone
9014912058
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,902
Expenses
$1,549
Assets
$1,672
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Rahsaan Overton (President)

People named in this filing

  • Rahsaan Overton (President)
  • Lauren Small (Secretary)
  • Omar Singleton (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of Healthy You, Healthy Us (HYHU) is to improve the knowledge, awareness, and health of communities at highest risk for developing diabetes.

What it reported doing in 2022

We provided diabetes education via PowerPoint presentation to 10 residents of a senior independent living apartment home, highlighting the basics of diabetes, living with and preventing diabetes, and the importance of exercise and nutrition. We tested residents' knowledge by playing a Diabetes Bingo game and provided the first 3 winners with prizes. We offered vitamin D and C supplements to all residents and gave away diabetes monitors to residents that needed new ones. We gave out printed educational materials highlighting diabetes management, preventing prediabetes, and proper food and nutrition for diabetics

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 40
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 30.4%; rating input score 30
  • Program expense ratio: 56.9%; rating input score 57

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 46.6%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 62.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 59% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 55.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 30.4% of revenue deployed · 56.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $882 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.